THE ROLE OF CITIZENS’ ACTIVITY IN FORMING OF SOCIAL CAPITAL OF A CITY


DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-2626/2019.25.4

Iryna Bukrieieva

Abstract


The article analyzes citizenship as a value system of a person (interests, principles, beliefs, ideas), which are the motives of his or her activism. Traditionally, this phenomenon has been studied through the connection of the individual with the social community, where activity is a systemic social quality, and public interests dominate over the individual. Another approach considers activity as an opportunity for a person to realize his or her interests and needs, combining individualism with various forms of solidarity and mutual assistance. This constructive view is consistent with the principles of subsidiary democracy and expands the field of civic participation.
Activity is defined as a system of human value orientations that motivate it to conscious actions aimed to the implementation of cultural, social, political and civic values, with a reasonable ratio of personal and social. In the information society, new forms of activity took shape, namely: discussions and propaganda of one's own position in social networks, mobilization of participation. Public associations form a sense of trust, solidarity, social responsibility, civic patriotism, and contribute to the accumulation of social capital. In connection with the processes of decentralization, the issue of participation in urban communities is of particular relevance, as cities create the country's economic and cultural power.
The results of a sociological study in the city of Melitopol indicate that the national-patriotic, environmental, charitable and volunteer organizations are the most significant for its residents. At the same time, the majority of respondents take part in their activities situationally, but consciously and voluntarily, which is consistent with national trends. The city has a certain resource of civic participation, which can help to increase its social capital.


Keywords


citizenship; trust; solidarity; support networks; civic participation

References


Abramov L.K. Azarova T.V. (2012). Tsentr Mistsevoi Aktyvnosti Dlia Rozvytku Hromad [The center of local activity for the development of communities]. Kirovohrad ISKM. (in Ukraine)

Akimov D.I. (2008). Sotsialnyiy marketing [Social marketing]. Kiev: Naukova dumka. 144 p. (in Ukraine)

Vplyv Sotsialnykh Komunikatsii Na Formuvannia Sotsiokulturnoho Kapitalu Mista Melitopolia Rezultaty Sotsiolohichnoho Doslidzhennia (2018) [The influence of social communications on the formation of sociocultural capital of the city of Melitopol: results of a sociological study]. Tsentr Sotsiolohichnykh Doslidzhen MDPU im.B.Khmelnytskoho. (in Ukraine).

Holovatyi M. F. (2005). Molodizhna Polityka v Ukraini problemy оnovlennia [Youth policy in Ukraine: problems updated]. K. Nauk.Dumka. 325 p. (in Ukraine).

Hromadianske suspilstvo ta hromadiany: stari problemy, novi vyklyky i perspektyvy. Dyskusiiaprezentatsiia [Civil society and citizens: old problems, new challenges and prospects. Discussionpresentation]. Fond «Demokratychni initsiatyvy» im. Ilka Kucheriva [Fund "Democratic Initiative" of Ilka Kucherіva]. URL: https://dif.org.ua/category/events (in Ukraine) (Last accessed: 13.11.2019).

Kostenok I. V. (2012). Hromadianska aktyvnist na mistsiakh yak odyn z indykatoriv intensyvnosti munitsypalnykh protsesiv: ukrainskyi vymir [Local civic activism as one of the indicators of the intensity of municipal processes: the Ukrainian dimension?] Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok [Рublic administration: improvement and development]. № 10, URL: http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=534 (in Ukraine) (Last accessed 13.11.2019).

Koen D.L., Arato E. (2003). Grazhdanskoe obschestvo i politicheskaya teoriya [Civil Society and Political Theory]. M.: Yzd-vo «Ves myr». 784 p. (in Rusian).

Patnam R D., Leonardi R., Nanetti R.I. (2001). Tvorennia demokratii: Tradytsii hromadianskoi aktyvnosti v suchasnii Italii [Creation of democracy: traditions of civic activism in modern Italy]; per. z anhl. V. Yushchenko. K.: Osnovy. 302 p. (in Ukraine).

Plyha O.B. (2008). Aktyvna uchast naselennia v derzhavnomu upravlinni yak umova formuvannia hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukraini [Active participation of the population in public administration as a condition for the formation of civil society in Ukraine]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho universytetu im. V.N. Karazina. Seriia Pravo [Bulletin of Kharkivsky University V.N. Karazina. Seriya Pravo]. № 819. 182-185. (in Ukraine).

Rozenblium Nensi L. (2001). Hromadianski suspilstva: liberalizm i moralni vplyvy pliuralizmu [Civil societies: liberalism and moral influences of pluralism]. Yi [J]. Ch. 21. 6–29. (in Ukraine).

Stepanenko V.P. (2015). Hromadianske suspilstvo: dyskursy i praktyky [Civil Society: discourses and practices]. K.: In-t sotsiolohii NAN Ukrainy. 420 p. (in Ukraine).

Tsvykh V. (2002). Hrupy interesiv, yikh instytuty ta orhanizatsii v hromadianskomu suspilstvi [Interesting groups, their institutes and organizations in civil society]. Liudyna i polityka [Man and Politics]. № 3. 33-46. (in Ukraine).

Coleman James S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Mass.: Belknap of Harvard University Press. 993 p.

Gellner Ernest.( 1994). Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and Its Rivals. 225 p.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.