Colonial and Anti-colonial Discourses in South-Ukrainian Historiography of the 19th – 20th Centuries and their Influence on Modern Realities



Oleksandr Muzychko

Abstract


Colonialism is one of the central themes of historical discourse. The modern world, formally parted from thecolonial form of organization of political space, preserves the colonial relationship in the organization of world economy. The problemof studying colonial relationship remain relevant. Postcolonial studies or postcolonial theory are a new direction of the humanitarianknowledge development where interaction of philosophy, history, literature, and policy.Earlier and now, the consciousness of the population was influenced by historians, who often combined scientific activitywith socio-political. The purpose of this article is to define the approaches of historians from southern Ukraine to the nationalquestion, their relationship to the problem of colonialism and anti-colonialism.For representatives of the Russian imperial ideology (A. Skalkovsky, G. Peretyatkovich, I. Linnychenko, E. Trifiliev, A.Florovsky, M. Rodzevich, G. Ge, A. Markevich and A. Berthier-Delagard, etc.) the most important were the Russian-centric view ofSlavic unity, conservatism, sometimes monarchism, the unity of the community of Great Russians, Little Russians and Belarusians.Ukrainian historians (in particular, L. Smolensky, O. Markevich, O. Andrievsky, P. Klepatsky, I. Bondarenko, M., O.Hrushevsky, V. Goshkevych, M. Arkas, D. Yavornytsky) contrasted the colonial, Russian, discourse, democracy, relaxed versions ofpan-Slavism in the case of Ukrainian and Poles. The greatest resonance among the historical books caused M. Arkas work.Historians actively turned to art and poetry, a publicistic genre for the dissemination of their ideas. There was also a reverse process.So, the Kherson poet Mykola Chernyavsky wrote many poems on the historical subject of the Cossacks of the history of Ukraine.Jewish historians Sh. Dubnov, I. Klausner, Georgians S. Avaliani and bishop Kirion, Poles A. Myodushevsky had a greatinfluence on the formation of the national identity of their compatriots. Liberation, anti-colonial motives, the activities of a number ofBulgarian, Serbian and Greek historians were permeated, they lived in Odesa. Today, South Ukraine is a place of keen struggle forUkrainian-centric historical identity. Authoritative sociological studies confirm this.Being in the process of establishment and development of postcolonial studies, the author submits his own point of view onthe problem of learning and teaching the history of Southern Ukraine. This article is addressed first of all to those, who strive to findnew research topics and methodological approaches in study of postcolonial problems.

Keywords: colony, anti-colonial movement, southern Ukraine, historiography, the national question.


References


BONDARENKO, I. (1908) Pro Garibal'di, borcya za volyu italijs'kogo narodu [About Garibaldi, a fighter for

the freedom of the Italian people]. Odesa, 63 pр. [in Ukr.].

BOROVOJ, S.YА. (1967) Do pitannya pro stanovyshhe Ukraini v period kapitalizmu. “On the situation in Ukraine in the period of capitalism”. In: Ukrains'kij istorichnij zhurnal, no. 8. Рр. 115-121. [in Ukr.].

VASKOVS'KIJ, R.YU. (2013) Dzherela do istorii Katerinoslava dobi Drugoi UNR. “Sources of history Yekaterinoslav of era Second UNR”. In: Istoriya torgivli, podatkiv ta myta, no. 2. Рр. 26-30. [in Ukr.].

ZAIKIN, V. (1925) Ukrainskaia istoricheskaia literatura poslednikh let 1919 – 1923 gg. “Ukrainian historical literature of the last years 1919 – 1923”. In: Na chuzhoi storone. [On another's side]. Praga, pp. 236-251. [in Rus.].

Konsolidaciya ukrains'kogo suspil'stva: shlyaxi, vyklyki, perspektyvy. Informacijno-analitychni materialy do fahovoi diskusii (2016). [The consolidation of Ukrainian society, ways, challenges and prospects. Information-analytical materials for expert discussion]. Kyiv, December 16, 2016. 100 pp. [in Ukr.].

LEONOVA, O.V. (2010) Osoblyvosti istoriografichnogo procesu v Katerinoslavi u drugij polovini XIX – na pochatku XX stolittya. “Peculiarities of historiographical process at Yekaterynoslav in the second half of XIX – early XX century” In: Gumanitarnyj zhurnal, no. 3 – 4 (lito-osin'). Dnipropetrovs'k, pp. 89-93. [in Ukr.].

Myhajlo Slabchenko v epistolyarnij ta memuarnij spadshhini (1882 – 1952) (2004) [Michael Slabchenko in epistolary and memoir heritage (1882 – 1952)] in Zaruba, V. (ed.). Dnipropetrovs'k, 352 pp. [in Ukr.].

Na zov Kyiva. Ukrains'kij nacionalizm u II Svitovij vijni. Zb. Statej, spogadiv i dokumentiv (1993) [On the The Call of Kyiv. Ukrainian nationalism in World War II. Collection of articles, memoirs and documents]. Kyiv, 540 pp. [in Ukr.].

OVSIIENKO, V. (2006) Barladyanu-Byrladnik Vasil' Volodimirovich In: The International Biographical Dictionary of dissidents of Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Vol. 1. Ukraine. Part 1. Kharkiv, 516 pp. [in Ukr.].

Odesskij listok (1903). November 9 [in Rus.].

POPOVA, T.N. (2007). Istoriografiia v litsakh, problemakh, distsiplinakh. Iz istorii Novorossiiskogo universiteta [Historiography in faces, problems, disciplines. From the history of Novorossiysk University]. Odessa, 536 pр. [in Rus.].

Ukrains'ke derzhavotvorennya. Akt 30 chervnya 1941 roku. Dokumenty i materialy (2001) [Ukrainian state building. Act of June 30, 1941. Documents and materials]. L'viv-Kyiv. 556 pр. [in Ukr.].

CHORNOVIL, V. (2006) Tvory. T. 3. (Ukrajinsjkyj visnyk, 1970-72) [Writings. Vol. 3. (Ukrainian Journal 1970-72)]. Kyiv. 976 pр. [in Ukr.].

SCHEPKIN, E. (1912) Igra v biryul'ki. “The game of spillikins” In: South thought. August 9. [in Rus.].


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.