Aspects of Deconsolidation of Modern Society: the Reconfiguration of Imperialism in the Co-Existence Sphere
Abstract
The article focuses on the study analysis of the deconsolidation modern society aspects. As these aspect is the empire ideology. It transforms the mechanisms and practices of its realization in modern social and cultural space. The nature of the modern social theory and its methodological potential, reveal contradictions that appear in the interpretation of social cohesion in the classical methodology of the problem study. Political philosophy defines sociality as one aspect politics. That is why it constructs the research methodology of society as a rational project. Consequently, this leads to crisis theory, the limited model of “universal unity by coercion”, which is the empire ideology. This phenomenon is a simulation of the social system integration, the destruction of sociality. It threatens its order and stability. The potential of the state does not allow to overcome the discourse of power. This limits the possibility of constructing social cohesion practices. Social crisis need to identify existence of the phenomenon of social integrity. In turn, the space that invests imperial tendencies in social practice is mass culture. This culture desire seeks to «liberate» man from responsibility and fear for their own greed. Thus, “mass culture” is a major tool for the expansion of imperial ideology in the social sphere. As the mechanism of production of consumer practices is the state. This global political and economic system forms the “cult of desire” at the level of public consciousness. “The worship of desire” outgrows individual order limits practices is realized in the state of political totalitarianism and mass market capitalism society. This means the restoration of relations community who are able to overcome the individualism of modern man and society, to destroy the cult of states. This methodological step reveals the nature of the phenomenon that produces the desire for power as the initial mechanism of development. A scientific novelty of this work is to identify the source mechanisms, practices and conditions of the imperialism ideology formation, which claims to solve the problem of social integrity. This theoretical and methodological step is necessary to design a comprehensive methodology for the study of this problem. Thus, the author focuses on the study of the ideology of imperialism as the basis of power claims system implemented in practice total consumerism. This can detect potential destructive phenomenon, its dangers in addressing social integrity, and thus overcome the problem of social crisis which modern researchers say.
Keywords: social integrity, imperialism, consumer practices, the state, the desire cult, mass culture.Full Text:
>PDF (Українська)
References
Tynan, A. A Missed Encounter?, Deleuze Studies, Nov 2011, Vol. 5, №. 3, Р. 431 – 437. 2.
Gvardini, R. End of modern philosophy: human phenomenon: An Anthology [Konec filosofii novogo vremeni: Fenomen cheloveka: Antologija], M.: High school, 1993, 349 p., Р. 240 – 296.
Karmazina, E. Mass culture and mass philosophy [Massovaja kul'tura i massovaja filosofija]. Idei i ideally, 2009, № 1, Р. 33 – 56.
Radugin, A. Culturology [Kul'turologija Filosofskie osnovy massovoj kul'tury]. Setevoj zhurnal «Kul'turolog», [Electronic resource].
Arendt, H. The Origins of Totalitarianism [Istoki totalitarizma] / Trans. from Eng. M.: TsentrKom, 1996. [Electronic resource].
Jaspers, K. The Origin and Goal of History [Smysl i naznachenie istorii], Trans. from Germ, M.: Politizdat, 1991, 527 p.
Mannheim, K. Selected works: Sociology of Culture. [Izbrannoe: Sociologija kul'tury], M.; SPb.: University Book, 2000, 501 p.
Berdyaev, N. Slavery and Freedom. Experience personalistic metaphysics [O rabstve i svobode cheloveka. Opyt personalisticheskoy metafiziki], Parizh [Electronic resource].
Brodetskaya, Yu. Community human relations [Obshchestvo chelovecheskikh otnosheniy: v poiskakh utrachennoy tselostnosti], Dnepropetrovsk, 2014, 370 p. 10.
Fromm, E. To Have or to Be? [Imet' ili byt'?] Trans. from Eng., M.: «AST», 2000. [Electronic resource].
Marcuse, Н. One-Dimensional Man. Boston, Beacon Press, 1966, [Electronic resource].
Marcuse, Н. Eros and Civilization [Jeros i civilizacija], Trans. from Eng. M.: AST, 2003, 528 p. 13. Nay, Dzh. The «soft» power and the american- European relations [«Myagkaya» sila i amerikanoevropeyskie otnosheniya]. Svobodnaya mysl-ХХI, 2004, № 10, P. 33 – 41.
Khabermas, Yu. The relationship between the system and the world of life under late capitalism [Otnosheniya mezhdu sistemoy i zhiznennym mirom v usloviyakh pozdnego kapitalizma]. Almanakh THESIS, 1993, Vol. 1, is. 2, P. 123 – 136. 15.
Horkheimer, M. Lehren aus dem Faschismus // Horkheimer M. Gesellschaft im Uebergang. Frankfurt at Main: Athenäum-Fischer-Taschenbuch-Verlag, 1981, Р. 36 – 59.
Gorz, A. Kritik der ökonomischen Vernunft: Sinnfragen am Ende der Arbeitsgesellschaft. Berlin: Rotbuch Verlag, 1989, S.78 – 79.
Kurz, R. Schwarzbuch Kapitalismus. Eichhorn Verlag, Frankfurt at Main, 1999, S.762–780.
Kurz, R. Der Kollaps der Modernisierung. Frankfurt at Main, 1991, 134 S.
Markuze, G. One-Dimensional Man [Odnomernyy chelovek. Issledovanie ideologii Razvitogo Industrialnogo Obshchestva], М.: «REFL-book», 1994, 368 р.
Agnoli, J., Bruckner, P. Die Transformation der Demokratie. Frankfurt at Main: Athenäum-Fischer-Taschenbuch- Verlag, 1968, 340 р.
Miles, St. Consumerism as a way of life. – L. etc.: Sage, 1998, 174 p.
Dame, V. Totalitarianism in the ХХ century [Totalitarizm v ХХ veke]. [Electronic resource].
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


